Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(8): 954-959, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2000207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections are the leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States. The major contributing factor is the placement of indwelling urinary catheters. METHODS: Following a chart review of adult patients hospitalized at a tertiary care medical center who required the use of a short-term (≤ 2 weeks) indwelling urinary catheter, a collaborative effort was initiated by an Infectious Diseases physician to develop protocols focused on the clinical service involved for the expeditious removal of short-term indwelling urinary catheters. The protocols relied in part on the standards of practice by pertinent medical/surgical subspecialty societies. Usage of urinary catheters and duration of hospitalization following implementation of the protocols was assessed. RESULTS: Based on a multivariate analysis controlling for demographic variables, comorbidities, medical vs surgical service, and indication for the urinary catheterization, the median duration of catheterization was significantly reduced from 6.7 days to 3.6 days after the protocols were initiated (P < .001), and the median duration of hospitalization was significantly reduced from 9.5 days to 5.9 days (P < .001). No patient had to have the urinary catheter reinserted. CONCLUSIONS: Development of collaborative protocols for the removal of short-term indwelling urinary catheters significantly reduced both the duration of catheterization and the duration of hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Adult , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Humans , Tertiary Healthcare , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(6): 764-768, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Until recently, there has been a lack of viable alternative to an indwelling urinary catheter for female patients that require precise urine output measurements. With the introduction of external female urinary catheters, we can now substitute this type of device for an indwelling urinary catheter in many patients, decreasing their risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the impact of a hospital-wide implementation of an external female urinary catheter at a large academic medical center. The study included female patients, greater than 18 years of age. We compared a 12-month period before and after device implementation to assess the impact on indwelling urinary catheter utilization and catheter-associated urinary tract infections rate. RESULTS: Data included over 220,000 patient days, over 10,000 external urinary catheter days and 33,000 indwelling urinary catheter days. We found a statistically significant decrease in indwelling urinary catheter utilization following the implementation of the external female urinary catheter, but only in intensive care units. CONCLUSIONS: It is our recommendation that facilities first implement the device in ICUs as this level of care was where we observed the most significant impact.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Urinary Tract Infections , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(1): 26-31, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1146282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a considerable impact on US hospitalizations, affecting processes and patient population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in hospitals. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of CLABSIs and CAUTIs in 78 US 12 months before COVID-19 and 6 months during COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: During the 2 study periods, there were 795,022 central-line days and 817,267 urinary catheter days. Compared to the period before the COVID-19 pandemic, CLABSI rates increased by 51.0% during the pandemic period from 0.56 to 0.85 per 1,000 line days (P < .001) and by 62.9% from 1.00 to 1.64 per 10,000 patient days (P < .001). Hospitals with monthly COVID-19 patients representing >10% of admissions had a National Health Safety Network (NHSN) device standardized infection ratio for CLABSI that was 2.38 times higher than hospitals with <5% prevalence during the pandemic period (P = .004). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus CLABSIs increased by 130% from 0.07 to 0.17 events per 1,000 line days (P < .001), and Candida spp by 56.9% from 0.14 to 0.21 per 1,000 line days (P = .01). In contrast, no significant changes were identified for CAUTI (0.86 vs 0.77 per 1,000 catheter days; P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial increases in CLABSIs but not CAUTIs. Our findings underscore the importance of hardwiring processes for optimal line care and regular feedback on performance to maintain a safe environment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Sepsis , Urinary Tract Infections , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/epidemiology , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
4.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(5): 844-847, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-690213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne by-products may have potential health implications. METHODS: We developed a simple way to use de conventional surgical evacuator coupled with de electrosurgical pen attached to a 14G bladder catheter for open surgery. It was used in ten prospective patients with breast cancer. RESULTS: We notice a high reduction in surgical smoke during all breast surgery. A questionnaire was used for all participants of the surgery to answer the impression that they had about the device. The subjective impression was that the surgical smoke in contact whit the surgical team was reduced by more than 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical smoke is the gaseous by-product produced by heat-generating devices in various surgical procedures. Surgical smoke may contain chemicals particles, bacteria, and viruses that are harmful and increase the risk of infection for surgeons and all the team in the operation room due to long term exposure of smoke mainly in coronavirus disease 2019 age. The adapted device described is a very simple and cheaper way to use smoke evacuators attached with the monopolar electrosurgical pen to reduce smoke exposure to the surgical team worldwide.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19/epidemiology , Electrosurgery/instrumentation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Electrosurgery/economics , Electrosurgery/methods , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Lymph Node Excision/instrumentation , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Mastectomy/instrumentation , Mastectomy/methods , Nipples/surgery , Operating Rooms , Pandemics , Smoke/prevention & control , Urinary Catheters
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL